<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links between CPM &amp; PDC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cpm-asset-management.co.uk/5/links-between-cpm-pdc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cpm-asset-management.co.uk/5/links-between-cpm-pdc/</link>
	<description>A Warning! To all who do, or would, have involvement with this company ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 21:20:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: der</title>
		<link>http://www.cpm-asset-management.co.uk/5/links-between-cpm-pdc/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>der</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cpm-asset-management.co.uk/links-between-cpm-pdc/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>they are totally seperate

&lt; -- edited by admin --&gt;

 I just had to put this one in. It&#039;s the indepth analysis I like! The deep and meaningful way in which each of the links evidenced between directors (historic as they may be) which are shown in the later post are negated with intelligent reasoned argument ... or maybe not.

Perhaps &#039;Der&#039; would like to get back to us - perhaps s/he could also answer whether, since such comments are their stock responses, they work for CPM or PDC or more possibly - Both?

&lt; -- end edit --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they are totally seperate</p>
<p>< -- edited by admin --></p>
<p> I just had to put this one in. It&#8217;s the indepth analysis I like! The deep and meaningful way in which each of the links evidenced between directors (historic as they may be) which are shown in the later post are negated with intelligent reasoned argument &#8230; or maybe not.</p>
<p>Perhaps &#8216;Der&#8217; would like to get back to us &#8211; perhaps s/he could also answer whether, since such comments are their stock responses, they work for CPM or PDC or more possibly &#8211; Both?</p>
<p>< -- end edit --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

